Occupational Asthma Reference
    
    
 
  | Suojalehto H, Suuronen K, Cullinan P, Lindström I, Sastre J, Walusiak-Skorupa J, Munoz X, Talini D, Klusackova P, Moore V, Merget R, Svanes C, Mason P, dell'Omo M, Moscato G, Quirce S, Hoyle J, Sherson D, Preisser A, Seed M, Rifflart C, Godet J, de Blay F, Vandenplas O, European network for the Phenotyping of Occupational Asthma (E-PHOCAS) investigators.,
    Phenotyping occupational asthma caused by acrylates in a multicentre cohort study.,
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract,
    2019;:,10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.017 | 
 
 | (Plain text: 
    Suojalehto H, Suuronen K, Cullinan P, Lindstrom I, Sastre J, Walusiak-Skorupa J, Munoz X, Talini D, Klusackova P, Moore V, Merget R, Svanes C, Mason P, dell'Omo M, Moscato G, Quirce S, Hoyle J, Sherson D, Preisser A, Seed M, Rifflart C, Godet J, de Blay F, Vandenplas O, European network for the Phenotyping of Occupational Asthma (E-PHOCAS) investigators.,
    Phenotyping occupational asthma caused by acrylates in a multicentre cohort study.,
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract) | 
 
	Keywords: acrylate, or, oa, rhinitis, FeNO, EU, 
 	
	
 
	
 
	
					Known Authors
					
  	
 If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.
 
 
 
					Abstract
 
					
					
					BACKGROUND: 
While acrylates are well-known skin sensitisers, they are not classified as respiratory sensitisers although several cases of acrylate-induced occupational asthma (OA) have been reported.
OBJECTIVES: 
The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of acrylate-induced OA in a large series of cases and compare those with OA induced by other low-molecular-weight (LMW) agents.
METHODS: 
Jobs and exposures, clinical and functional characteristics, and markers of airway inflammation were analysed in an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort of subjects with OA ascertained by a positive inhalation challenge to acrylates (n= 55) or other LMW agents (n=418) including isocyanates (n=125).
RESULTS: 
Acrylate-containing glues were the most prevalent products and industrial manufacturing, dental work and beauty care were typical occupations causing OA. Work related rhinitis was more common in acrylate than isocyanate-induced asthma (p< 0.001). The increase in post-challenge fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) was significantly greater in acrylate-induced OA (26.0, 8.2-38.0 ppb) than in OA induced by other LMW agents (3.0, -1.0-10.0 ppb, p< 0.001) or isocyanates (5.0, 2.0-16.0 ppb, p=0.010). Multivariable models confirmed that OA induced by acrylates was significantly and independently associated with a post-challenge increase in FeNO (=17.5 ppb).
CONCLUSIONS: 
Acrylate-induced OA shows specific characteristics, concomitant work-related rhinitis and exposure-related increases in FeNO, suggesting that acrylates may induce asthma through different immunological mechanisms than other LMW agents. Our findings reinforce the need for a re-evaluation of the hazard classification of acrylates, and further investigation of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying their respiratory sensitizing potential.
					
 		
					Full Text
 
	
     Full text of this reference not available
			
			
			
		
			Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference
			
	      
 
 
 				
				
			
				Comments
				
			 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
 Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.