Occupational Asthma Reference
Fishwick D, Barber CM, Bradshaw LM, Ayres JG, Barraclough R, Burge S, Corne JM, Cullinan P, Frank TL, Hendrick D, Hoyle J, Curran AD, Niven R, Pickering T, Reid P, Robertson A, Stenton C, Warburton CJ, Nicholson PJ,
Standards of care for occupational asthma: an update,
Thorax,
2012;67:278-280,
|
|
Keywords: guidelines, key, UK, occupational asthma
Known Authors
If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.
Abstract
Background
The British Thoracic Society (BTS) Standards of Care (SoC) Committee produced a standard of care for occupational asthma (OA) in 2008, based on a systematic evidence review performed in 2004 by the British Occupational Health Research Foundation (BOHRF).
Methods
BOHRF updated the evidence base from 2004–2009 in 2010.
Results
This article summarises the changes in evidence and is aimed at physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care, occupational health and public health and at employers, workers and their health, safety and other representatives.
Conclusions
Various recommendations and evidence ratings have changed in the management of asthma that may have an occupational cause.
Full Text
Comments
The audit tool, against which clinical activity should be measured, is revised as follows. All
patients with suspected OA should, as a minimum, have the following clearly documented in
their health records.
By first visit
o Presence or absence of asthma prior to potentially harmful asthmagen exposure at work
o Presence or absence of work-related eye or nasal symptoms
o Presence or absence of work-related respiratory symptoms and their duration
o A full list of occupations held, their durations, and likely associated occupational exposures
o Current ongoing asthmagen exposure
o Whether other workers at the same workplace are affected
o FEV1, FVC, and the degree of airflow limitation, compared to predicted values
By second visit
o If at work and appropriate; serial PEF measurements taken for at least 3 continuous weeks including rest days, with at least 4 good quality readings per day, analysed to assess work relatedness.
o If performed, the results of non specific bronchial responsiveness
o If exposed to allergen with appropriate specific IgE measure or skin prick test, the result of this test.
|
Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.