1. Colophny fume can occasionally cause irritant reactions in high dose in asthmatics with marked non-specific ractivity, but this is unusual. There is a lot of challenge data showing no reactions in many asthmatics. The best data comes from the relationship between colophony exposure and NSBR (Burge PS, Non-specific hyperreactivity in workers exposed to toluene diisocyanate, diphenyl methane diisocyanate and colophony, Eur J Respir Dis,1982;63suppl.1:91-96) where there was probable one irritant reaction in a severe asthmatic without previous colophony exposure
2. If you accept that regular exposure to ordinary levels of a respiratory irritant can cause occupational asthma, the clinical picture is the same (and probably the clinical consequences) It is likely to be just as bad for health (Burge PS, Moore VC, Robertson AS , Sensitization and irritant-induced occupational asthma with latency are clinically indistinguishable, Occup Med,2012;62:129-133)
3. The colophony exposures are colophony alone, the challenges with flux-cored solder in addition contain the activators (mostly amine hydrochlorides). (Burge PS, Harries MG, O'Brien IM, Pepys J, Bronchial provocation studies in workers exposed to the fumes of electronic soldering fluxes, Clin Allergy,1980;10:137-149)
4. There used to be an exposure standard based on the aldehyde content of the fume which has been discredited. There are methods for detecting the resin acids in air but they are difficult, clinically there seems to be a clear case for substitution which is reducing the number of solderers with occupational asthma that I see
|