BOHRF Original Authors' Main Conclusions
The original authors' main conclusions are taken from Abstract, Results and
Discussion. They are decided upon by the authors of the BOHRF occupational
asthma guidelines and form part of the guidelines.
In a prospective study of laboratory technicians, selected indicators of allergy and atopy were studied in an attempt to determine predictors of laboratory-animal allergy (LAA). From results it does not seem likely that refusing to employ atopic subjects in animal work will prevent the development of LAA. Preventing atopic subjects from animal work would only have reduced the 9 sensitised and/or symptomatic subjects to 7. Preventing subjects with total IgE levels >100 kU/l from working with animals would have reduced the number of subjects developing LAA to 2 instead of 9. On the other hand, 8 non-reactive subjects (after this study) would also have been excluded from such work.
BOHRF Associated Evidence Statements
The BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines state that this reference is associated
with the following evidence statements
This page is showing the information from the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines for this reference. To see additional information, including opinions left by users of this website please view the full reference. This page allows users to comment on the reference and suggest it as evidence for questions. These may be the existing questions from the Bohrf occupational asthma guidelines or questions that have been put forward by users of this website.