BOHRF Original Authors' Main Conclusions
The original authors' main conclusions are taken from Abstract, Results and
Discussion. They are decided upon by the authors of the BOHRF occupational
asthma guidelines and form part of the guidelines.
Results indicate that the use of the pre-employment screening criteria as determinants for hiring persons to work with laboratory animals is unwarranted especially in view of two observations: (1) the dearth of reliable estimates of the strength of association between the screening criteria and laboratory animal allergy; and (2) the absence of a carefully formulated consensus approach to the problem of allergy to laboratory animals. The authors conclude that the implementation of any occupational screening program should be preceded by careful evaluation of its risks and benefits by all groups involved, that any potential medical benefits of screening should outweigh its disadvantages or hazards, and that a clearly developed policy on the use of results of the screening programme should be established. Pre-employment screening should be viewed as only one of several possible approaches to the problem of prevention of occupational disease.
BOHRF Associated Evidence Statements
The BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines state that this reference is associated
with the following evidence statements
This page is showing the information from the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines for this reference. To see additional information, including opinions left by users of this website please view the full reference. This page allows users to comment on the reference and suggest it as evidence for questions. These may be the existing questions from the Bohrf occupational asthma guidelines or questions that have been put forward by users of this website.