Abstract

Background
Ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) is a high-level disinfectant commonly used for processing heat-sensitive medical devices.

Objective
We report 4 patients who experienced 9 episodes of anaphylaxis following cystoscopy after a urology practice switched from using Cidex (glutaraldehyde [GTA]) to OPA for disinfecting their cystoscopes.

Methods
Allergic evaluations consisted of: skin testing to saline, histamine, glycerin, lidocaine, latex, GTA, and OPA and blood tests for total immunoglobulin E (IgE) and latex specific IgE.

Findings
The 4 patients were evaluated after 3 of them had experienced 2 episodes of anaphylaxis and one of them 3 episodes following outpatient cystoscopy for ongoing evaluation of bladder cancer. Skin testing of subjects and controls to lidocaine, latex, latex specific IgE, and GTA was negative. Skin testing to OPA resulted in immediate wheal and flare reactions in all 4 patients within 20 minutes and late reactions at 24 hours but negative reactions in controls. Subsequent to the testing, 3 of the patients returned for repeat cystoscopy in which GTA but not OPA was used to disinfect the cystoscopes and tolerated the procedure.

Conclusions
OPA solution should be considered a cause of anaphylactic/allergic reactions following cystoscopy and possibly following instrumentation with other medical devices disinfected by this material.

Keywords
Anaphylaxis;

GTA (glutaraldehyde);
high-level disinfectant

Abbreviations
GTA, Glutaraldehyde (Cidex);
OPA, Ortho-phthalaldehyde (Cidex-OPA)

Full Text

Comments