Occupational Asthma Reference

COCKCROFT A, EDWARDS J, BEVAN C, CAMPBELL I, COLLINS G, HOUSTON K, JENKINS D, LATHAM S, SAUNDERS M, TROTMAN D, An investigation of operating theatre staff exposed to humidifier fever antigens, Br J Industr Med, 1981;38:144-151,

Keywords: EAA, Alveolitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, healthcare, operating theatre, humidifier, outbreak, IgG, challenge, follow-up, Wales

Known Authors

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.


Sixty staff working in a hospital operating theatre, where a case of humidifier fever had been identified, were studied together with 49 subjects working in other parts of the hospital. They each had a blood test for serology, a skin test, and a chest radiograph and completed a questionnaire. The theatre staff also had pulmonary function tests. The theatre humidifier was found to contain several organisms including amoebae and antigens cross-reacting highly with those implicated in previous outbreaks of humidifier fever. Of the 60 exposed subjects, 25 had developed antibodies, nine had probable symptoms of humidifier fever, and six possible symptoms. There was a strong association between symptoms and antibodies (p = 6 x 10-5 by Fisher's exact test). The development of antibodies was also related to duration of exposure in the theatre (p <001 by x2 test for trend) and inversely to smoking (p = 0 0073 by Fisher's exact test) but not to history of atopy. Because of the presence of antigens and because certain biocides added were ineffective in controlling antigenic build-up the humidifier was switched off. Eight months later specific IgG levels in the theatre staff sera, estimated by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique, had fallen on average by 25%. Inhalation challenge with humidifier water was performed in eight subjects. The inhalation of humidifier water produced reactions in four of the eight subjects. Neither of the non-exposed controls reacted, one of the exposed subjects without antibodies or symptoms reacted, one of the exposed subjects with antibodies but without previous symptoms reacted, and both of the exposed subjects with antibodies and with previous symptoms reacted. The reactions were mainly systemic with fever, chills, arthralgia, headache, and general malaise, maximal between 10 and 12 hours after challenge.

Full Text


Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.

Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo