Occupational Asthma Reference

Atlas RM, Williams JF, Huntington MK, Legionella contamination of dental-unit waters, Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 1995;61:1208-1213,

Keywords: water, USA, Legionella pneumophila, fountain, DNA, dentist, ep, cross sectional

Known Authors

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

Water samples collected from 28 dental facilities in six U.S. states were examined for the presence of Legionella pneumophila and other Legionella spp. by the PCR-gene probe, fluorescent- antibody microscopic, and viable-plate-count detection methods. The PCR and fluorescent-antibody detection methods, which detect both viable and viable nonculturable Legionella spp., gave higher counts and rates of detection than the plate count method. By the PCR-gene probe detection method, Legionella spp. were detected in 68% of the dental-unit water samples and L. pneumophila was detected in 8%. Concentrations of Legionella spp. in dental-unit water reached 1,000 organisms per ml or more in 36% of the samples, and 19% of the samples were in the category of 10,000/ml or above. L. pneumophila, when present in dental-unit water, never reached concentrations of 1,000/ml or more. Microscopic examination with fluorescent-antibody staining indicated that the contamination was in the dental-unit water lines rather than in the handpieces. Legionella spp. were present in 61% of potable water samples collected for comparative analysis from domestic and institutional faucets and drinking fountains; this percentage was not significantly different from the rate of detection of Legionella spp. in dental-unit water. However, in only 4% of the potable water samples did Legionella spp. reach concentrations of 1,000 organisms per ml, and none was in the 10,000 organisms-per- ml category, and so health-threatening levels of Legionella spp. in potable water were significantly lower than in dental-unit water. L. pneumophila was found in 2% of the potable water samples, but only at the lowest detectable level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) 0 (DNA Probes)

Full Text

Full text of this reference not available

Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo