Occupational Asthma Reference
|
Schwartz DA, Landas SK, Lassise DL, Burmeister LF, Hunninghake GW, Merchant JA,
Airway injury in swine confinement workers,
Ann Intern Med,
1992;116:630-635,
|
|
|
Keywords: oa, pig, bal, farmer, hi, br, residual volume
Known Authors
If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether work-related respiratory symptoms are indicative of underlying lung disease among swine confinement workers and, if so, to identify whether respiratory changes were more indicative of airway or of interstitial lung injury. DESIGN: Nested case-control study within a population-based longitudinal study.
SETTING
University hospital.
PARTICIPANTS
Study participants were randomly selected from a group of 207 swine confinement workers followed longitudinally. Of these, 43 workers with respiratory symptoms were identified, and 31 were randomly selected for inclusion in this study. Three control groups (swine confinement workers, neighbor farmers, and blue collar workers) without work-related respiratory symptoms were frequency-matched by age, sex, and smoking status to the symptomatic swine confinement workers.
MEASUREMENTS
Spirometry and lung volumes, diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide, chest radiograph, methacholine airway challenge, and bronchoalveolar lavage were done. An endobronchial biopsy was done in the last 27 participants evaluated. RESULTS: Although spirometric measures of airflow were similar between the symptomatic swine confinement workers and the three control groups, swine confinement cases were found to have significant elevations in residual volume (126.5 +/- 28.2 L) when compared to swine confinement controls (115.4 +/- 38.4 L; P less than or equal to 0.05), neighborhood farmer controls (101.1 +/- 29.4 L; P less than or equal to 0.005), and blue collar controls (106.4 +/- 30.4 L; P less than or equal to 0.05). Swine confinement cases also had an enhanced airway response to inhaled methacholine and had thickening of the epithelial basement membrane of the lobar bronchi. No parenchymal injury was observed in the swine confinement cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that swine confinement workers who have work-related respiratory symptoms are at risk for airway, but not parenchymal, lung injury, and that spirometry may not accurately reflect the extent of airway injury
Full Text
Full text of this reference not available
Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference
Comments
Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.