Occupational Asthma Reference
Neukirch F, Liard R, Segala C, Korobaeff M, Henry C, Cooreman J,
Peak expiratory flow variability and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. An epidemiologic study in 117 workers,
Am Rev Respir Dis,
1992;146:71-75,
|
|
Keywords: as , methacholine, peak flow, rh
Known Authors
If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.
Abstract
We studied the relationships between peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in 117 workers attending the annual compulsory examination (mean age, 38.7 yr +/- 9.5; men, 86.3%). Subjects recorded their highest PEF out of three, every 3 waking hours (i.e., five times a day) for 7 days, each using a newly purchased Vitalograph peak flow meter, and underwent methacholine challenge tests with a maximal cumulative dose of 1,200 micrograms. Those with a FEV1 fall of 15% or more were considered as reactors. The variability of PEF was expressed as the amplitude percent mean, calculated from daily amplitude (highest-lowest reading/mean reading of the day x 100), averaged over 6 days, from the second to the seventh. This index had a continuous distribution, skewed towards the greatest amplitudes, and correlated negatively with FEV1 (r = -0.25, p = 0.01). Subjects with asthma (n = 8) had greater variations. In the 109 nonasthmatics, greater variability was observed in subjects with wheeze apart from colds, breathlessness, or hay fever; the average amplitude was greater in reactors than in nonreactors to methacholine (16.9% versus 9.3%, p less than 0.001). The subjects with excessive PEF variability were all methacholine reactors, but they were only a subgroup of the reactors. These results provide evidence that excessive PEF variability is an indicator of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in a population sample
Full Text
Full text of this reference not available
Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference
Comments
Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.