Systematic Review of diagnostic tests for occupational asthma |
|
This systematic review supports the BOHRF evidence based review using inverse variance methods for random effects to calculate pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Comparing results with specific challenge tests the results showed (mean and 95% CI)
Non-specific hyper-responsibeness sensitivity 79.3% (68-88) High MW
66.7% (58-74) Low MW
specificity 51.3% (35-67) High MW
63.9% (56-71) Low MW
Skin prick tests sensitivity 80.6% (70-88) High MW
72.9% (60-83) Low MW
specificity 59.6% (42-75) High MW
86.2% (77-92) Low MW
Specific IgE sensitivity 73.3% (64-81) High MW
31.2% (23-41) Low MW
specificity 79.0% (50-93) High MW
88.9% (77-92) Low MW
Skin prick test plus NSBR sensitivity 60.6% (21-90) High MW
specificity 82.5% (54-95) High MW
References
|
Beach J, Russell K, Blitz S, Hooton N, Spooner C, Lemiere C, Tarlo SM, Rowe BH,
A Systematic Review of the Diagnosis of Occupational Asthma,
Chest,
2007;131:569-578,
|
|
|
|
|
Comments
Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.