BOHRF Original Authors' Main Conclusions
The original authors' main conclusions are taken from Abstract, Results and
Discussion. They are decided upon by the authors of the BOHRF occupational
asthma guidelines and form part of the guidelines.
Previous findings that atopics were more likely than non-atopics to become skin prick test positive to a standardised enzymes reagent have been confirmed. An atopic was defined as having a history of atopy (e.g. infantile eczema, asthma, hayfever) and/or a positive skin prick test to one or more common allergens. For non-atopics, 40% of employees with high exposure became skin prick test positive to enzymes versus 9.5% of those with medium exposure and 4.5% of those with intermittent exposure. For atopics, 75% of employees with high exposure became skin prick test positive to enzymes versus 20% of those with intermittent exposure. A reduction in the in the level of enzyme exposure led to a reduction in the level of sensitisation and respiratory symptoms. (However, no evidence of significant differences in change per annum in FEV1 as percentage between the positive and negative skin prick test employees in any group. Therefore it is significant that atopics are more likely to become sensitised but there is no evidence that this results in changes in lung function).
BOHRF Associated Evidence Statements
The BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines state that this reference is associated
with the following evidence statements
This page is showing the information from the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines for this reference. To see additional information, including opinions left by users of this website please view the full reference. This page allows users to comment on the reference and suggest it as evidence for questions. These may be the existing questions from the Bohrf occupational asthma guidelines or questions that have been put forward by users of this website.