BOHRF Original Authors' Main Conclusions
The original authors' main conclusions are taken from Abstract, Results and
Discussion. They are decided upon by the authors of the BOHRF occupational
asthma guidelines and form part of the guidelines.
Subjects observed on average 4 years after diagnosis - 96 continued to work with red cedar, 136 left the industry. Of these, only 55/136 recovered completely whereas 81 were still symptomatic. Those that recovered were younger, had significantly better pulmonary function and a lesser degree of non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness at time of diagnosis, indicating diagnosis at an earlier stage of the disease. A higher proportion of patients who recovered had late asthmatic reaction on inhalation provocation test at time of diagnosis. All 96 subjects still exposed had respiratory symptoms and required medication.
Authors concluded that the most important determinant of favourable outcome is early diagnosis and removal from exposure. Partial removal from exposure did not prevent the decline in lung function.
BOHRF Associated Evidence Statements
The BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines state that this reference is associated
with the following evidence statements
This page is showing the information from the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines for this reference. To see additional information, including opinions left by users of this website please view the full reference. This page allows users to comment on the reference and suggest it as evidence for questions. These may be the existing questions from the Bohrf occupational asthma guidelines or questions that have been put forward by users of this website.