BOHRF Original Authors' Main Conclusions
The original authors' main conclusions are taken from Abstract, Results and
Discussion. They are decided upon by the authors of the BOHRF occupational
asthma guidelines and form part of the guidelines.
A study of 243 workers exposed to diphenylmethane di-isocyanate (MDI) was conducted in a plant that had been designed to minimize MDI. On the basis of questionnaire responses, diagnoses were derived that included occupational asthma; non-OA; work-related and non-work-related rhinitis; and lower respiratory irritant responses. PEFR values were abnormal in 3/9 workers with occupational asthma, in 2/4 with non-OA, and in 2/23 case control subjects. A significant association was found between peak flow rate variability and a questionnaire asthma diagnosis. Physicians confirmed 3 cases of occupational asthma, one of which in symptom-free control worker). In all 3 cases asthma symptoms remitted after the worker left the workplace. On the basis of these cases, specific work activities associated with exposure to MDI were identified and corrective measures were instituted. Strict control and monitoring of ambient MDI exposure was associated with a low prevalence of specific sensitisation to MDI and a lower than expected prevalence of occupational asthma.
BOHRF Associated Evidence Statements
The BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines state that this reference is associated
with the following evidence statements
This page is showing the information from the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines for this reference. To see additional information, including opinions left by users of this website please view the full reference. This page allows users to comment on the reference and suggest it as evidence for questions. These may be the existing questions from the Bohrf occupational asthma guidelines or questions that have been put forward by users of this website.