BOHRF Original Authors' Main Conclusions
The original authors' main conclusions are taken from Abstract, Results and
Discussion. They are decided upon by the authors of the BOHRF occupational
asthma guidelines and form part of the guidelines.
At 12 months, 13/25 were removed from exposure (Group A) whereas 12 continued to be exposed (Group B). Immediately after diagnosis, asthma severity improved irrespective of whether patient removed from exposure or continued exposure, probably as a result of better therapeutic regimen. At 12 months re-evaluation, 6/13 were asymptomatic in group A, whereas in group B, all subjects were still symptomatic. In occupational asthma, cessation of exposure to the offending agent results in a decrease in asthma severity and in pharmaceutical expenses, but is associated with a deterioration of the individual's socio-economic status
The following comments are from the editors of the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines
and form part of the guidelines.
Those removed from exposure suffered 26.6% loss in annual income
BOHRF Associated Evidence Statements
The BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines state that this reference is associated
with the following evidence statements
This page is showing the information from the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines for this reference. To see additional information, including opinions left by users of this website please view the full reference. This page allows users to comment on the reference and suggest it as evidence for questions. These may be the existing questions from the Bohrf occupational asthma guidelines or questions that have been put forward by users of this website.