Occupational Asthma Reference

R├╝egger M, Droste D, Hofmann M, Jost M, Miedinger D, Diisocyanate-induced asthma in Switzerland: long-term course and patients' self-assessment after a 12-year follow-up, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 2014;9:21,10.1186/1745-6673-9-21
(Plain text: Ruegger M, Droste D, Hofmann M, Jost M, Miedinger D, Diisocyanate-induced asthma in Switzerland: long-term course and patients' self-assessment after a 12-year follow-up, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology)

Keywords:

Known Authors

Martin Ruegger, Luzern Martin Ruegger

David Miedinger, Lucern, Basel and Montreal David Miedinger

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

Background
Isocyanates are among the most common causes of occupational asthma (OA) in Switzerland. Patients with OA have been shown to have unfavourable medical, socioeconomic and psychological outcomes. We investigated long-term asthma and the socio-economic outcomes of diisocyanate-induced asthma (DIA) in Switzerland.

Patients and methods:
We conducted an observational study on 49 patients with DIA and followed 35 of these patients over a mean exposure-free interval of 12 +/- 0.5 (range 11.0-13.0) years. At the initial and follow-up examinations, we recorded data on respiratory symptoms and asthma medication; measured the lung function; and tested for bronchial hyperreactivity. We allowed the patients to assess their state of health and overall satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at these visits.

Results
The 35 patients whom we could follow had a median symptomatic exposure time of 12 months, interquartile range (IQR) 26 months and a median overall exposure time of 51 (IQR 104) months. Their subjective symptoms (p < 0.001) and the use of asthma medication (p = 0.002), particularly the use of inhaled corticosteroids (p < 0.001), decreased by nearly 50%. At the same time, the self-assessment of the patients' state of health and overall satisfaction increased considerably according to both symptomatology and income. In contrast, slight reductions in terms of FVC% predicted from 102% to 96% (p = 0.04), of FEV1% predicted from 91% to 87% (p = 0.06) and of the FEV1/FVC ratio of 3%; (p = 0.01) were observed while NSBHR positivity did not change significantly. In univariate as well as multivariate logistic analyses we showed significant associations between age, duration of exposure and FEV1/FVC ratio with persistent asthma symptoms and NSBHR.

Conclusions
We found that the patients' symptoms, the extent of their therapy and the decrease in their lung volumes during the follow-up period were similar to the findings in the literature. The same hold true for some prognostic factors, whereas the patients' self-assessment of their state of health and overall satisfaction improved considerably.

Full Text

Associated Questions

Registered users of this website have associated this reference with the following questions. This association is not a part of the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines.

What is the prognosis of occupational asthma?
burgeps

Please Log In or Register to put forward this reference as evidence to a question.

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo