Occupational Asthma Reference

Seed M, Agius R, Further validation of computer-based prediction of chemical asthma hazard, Occup Med, 2010;60:115-120,

Keywords: occupational asthma, molecular prediction, causes, structure-function

Known Authors

Raymond Agius, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Manchester University Raymond Agius

Martin Seed, Manchester University Martin Seed

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

Background There is no agreed protocol for the prediction of low molecular weight (LMW) respiratory sensitizers. This creates challenges for occupational physicians responsible for the health of workforces using novel chemicals and respiratory physicians investigating cases of occupational asthma caused by novel asthmagens.

Aims To iterate the external validation of a previously published quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) model for the prediction of novel chemical respiratory sensitizers and to better characterize its predictive accuracy.

Methods An external validation set of control chemicals was identified from the Australian Hazardous Substances Information System. An external validation set of asthmagenic chemicals was identified by a thorough search of the peer-reviewed literature from January 1995 onwards using the Medline database. The QSAR model was used to determine an ‘asthma hazard index’ (between 0 and 1) for each chemical.

Results A total of 28 external validation asthmagens and 129 control chemicals were identified. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the model's ability to distinguish asthmagens from controls was 0.87 (95% CI 0.76–0.97). Using a cut-off hazard index of 0.5 resulted in sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 93%. For prior probability ranging from 1:300 to 1:100, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 1 and positive predictive value (PPV) 0.04–0.1 while for prior probability ranging from 1:20 to 1:3, the NPV was 0.91–0.99 and PPV 0.39–0.85.

Conclusions The ROC curve for this QSAR demonstrates good global predictive power for distinguishing asthmagenic from non-asthmagenic LMW organic compounds. Potential for utilization by occupational and respiratory physicians is evident from its predictive values.

Plain text: Background There is no agreed protocol for the prediction of low molecular weight (LMW) respiratory sensitizers. This creates challenges for occupational physicians responsible for the health of workforces using novel chemicals and respiratory physicians investigating cases of occupational asthma caused by novel asthmagens. Aims To iterate the external validation of a previously published quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model for the prediction of novel chemical respiratory sensitizers and to better characterize its predictive accuracy. Methods An external validation set of control chemicals was identified from the Australian Hazardous Substances Information System. An external validation set of asthmagenic chemicals was identified by a thorough search of the peer-reviewed literature from January 1995 onwards using the Medline database. The QSAR model was used to determine an 'asthma hazard index' (between 0 and 1) for each chemical. Results A total of 28 external validation asthmagens and 129 control chemicals were identified. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the model's ability to distinguish asthmagens from controls was 0.87 (95% CI 0.76-0.97). Using a cut-off hazard index of 0.5 resulted in sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 93%. For prior probability ranging from 1:300 to 1:100, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 1 and positive predictive value (PPV) 0.04-0.1 while for prior probability ranging from 1:20 to 1:3, the NPV was 0.91-0.99 and PPV 0.39-0.85. Conclusions The ROC curve for this QSAR demonstrates good global predictive power for distinguishing asthmagenic from non-asthmagenic LMW organic compounds. Potential for utilization by occupational and respiratory physicians is evident from its predictive values.

Full Text

Full text of this reference not available

Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference

Associated Questions

There are no associations for this paper.

Please Log In or Register to put forward this reference as evidence to a question.

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo