Occupational Asthma Reference

Moore VC, Parsons NR, Jaakkola MS, Burge CBSG, Pantin CF, Robertson AS, Burge PS, Serial lung function variability using four portable logging meters, J Asthma, 2009;46:961-966,

Keywords: PEF, peak flow, measurement, Easy-one, Micromed, Vitalograph, Piko, FEV1, diurnal variation

Known Authors

Sherwood Burge, Oasys Sherwood Burge

Charles Pantin, Keele, UK Charles Pantin

Vicky Moore, Oasys Vicky Moore

Cedd Burge, Oasys Cedd Burge

Alastair Robertson, Selly Oak Hospital Alastair Robertson

Maritta Jaakkola, Oulu University Finland Maritta Jaakkola

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

Objective. Portable lung function logging meters that allow measurement of peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) are useful for the diagnosis and exclusion of asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the within and between-session variability of PEF and FEV1 for four logging meters and to determine the sensitivity of meters to detect FEV1 and PEF diurnal changes.

Methods. Thirteen assessors (all hospital staff members) were asked to record 1 week of 2-hour PEF and FEV1 measurements using four portable lung function meters. Within-session variability of PEF and FEV1 were compared for each meter using a coefficient of variation (COV). Between-session variability was quantified using parameter estimates from a cosinor analysis which modeled diurnal change for both lung function measures and also allowed for variation between days for individual sessions.

Results. The mean within-session COV for FEV1 was consistently lower than that for PEF (p < 0.001). PEF showed a higher but not significantly different (p = 0.068) sensitivity for detecting diurnal variation than FEV1. PEF was also slightly more variable between days, but not significantly different than FEV1 (p = 0.409). PEF and FEV1 diurnal variability did not differ between the 4 meters (p = 0.154 and 0.882 respectively), but within-session FEV1 COV differed between meters (p = 0.009).

Conclusion. PEF was marginally more sensitive to within-day variability than FEV1 but was less repeatable. Overall, differences between the 4 meters were small, suggesting that all meters are clinically useful.

Full Text

Full text of this reference not available

Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference

Associated Questions

There are no associations for this paper.

Please Log In or Register to put forward this reference as evidence to a question.

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo