Occupational Asthma Reference

Malo JL, Ghezzo H, Recovery of methacholine responsiveness after end of exposure in occupational asthma., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2004;169:1304-1307,

Keywords: methachole, NSBR, prognosis, follow-up, Canada

Known Authors

Jean-Luc Malo, Hôpital de Sacré Coeur, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Jean-Luc Malo

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

Recent data suggest that responsiveness to methacholine continues to improve 2 and more years after cessation of exposure to agents causing occupational asthma (OA). The goal of this study was to characterize further the curve of improvement to methacholine responsiveness in subjects with OA.
Eighty subjects with confirmed OA who had at least two assessments of a provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% drop in FEV(1) (PC(20)) and were seen for at least 2 years after cessation of exposure. The shape of recovery of PC(20) was assessed by CARMA (James K. Lindsey, Liège, Belgium) analysis. Slopes of recovery were compared in the first 2.5 years in 55 subjects and from 2.5 years until the end of observation in 56 subjects. Recovery curves showed progressive improvements in PC(20) significantly influenced by time lapse since end of exposure, sex, baseline PC(20), and FEV(1). The slopes of recovery were significantly different from zero both for the first 2.5 years after cessation of exposure (0.27 +/- 0.05 SEM natural logarithm of PC(20) per year) and later (0.09 +/- 0.008 SEM natural logarithm of PC(20) per year), with the slope significantly steeper for the first 2.5 years. This study shows that improvement in responsiveness to methacholine continues for years after cessation of exposure but that the improvement is more rapid in the first 2.5 years.

Plain text: Recent data suggest that responsiveness to methacholine continues to improve 2 and more years after cessation of exposure to agents causing occupational asthma (OA). The goal of this study was to characterize further the curve of improvement to methacholine responsiveness in subjects with OA. Eighty subjects with confirmed OA who had at least two assessments of a provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% drop in FEV(1) (PC(20)) and were seen for at least 2 years after cessation of exposure. The shape of recovery of PC(20) was assessed by CARMA (James K. Lindsey, Liege, Belgium) analysis. Slopes of recovery were compared in the first 2.5 years in 55 subjects and from 2.5 years until the end of observation in 56 subjects. Recovery curves showed progressive improvements in PC(20) significantly influenced by time lapse since end of exposure, sex, baseline PC(20), and FEV(1). The slopes of recovery were significantly different from zero both for the first 2.5 years after cessation of exposure (0.27 +/- 0.05 SEM natural logarithm of PC(20) per year) and later (0.09 +/- 0.008 SEM natural logarithm of PC(20) per year), with the slope significantly steeper for the first 2.5 years. This study shows that improvement in responsiveness to methacholine continues for years after cessation of exposure but that the improvement is more rapid in the first 2.5 years.

Full Text

Full text of this reference not available

Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference

Associated Questions

Registered users of this website have associated this reference with the following questions. This association is not a part of the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines.

What is the prognosis of occupational asthma?
burgeps

Please Log In or Register to put forward this reference as evidence to a question.

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo