Occupational Asthma Reference

Kongerud J, Soyseth V, Burge PS, Serial measurements of peak expiratory flow and responsiveness to methacholine in the diagnosis of aluminium potroom asthma, Thorax, 1992;47:292-297,

Keywords: oa, br, aluminium, potroom, peak flow, PEF, methacholine, diagnosis, asthma, methods, cross sectional, plant, FEV1, home, diurnal, diurnal variation, exposure, irritant, mechanism

Known Authors

Sherwood Burge, Oasys Sherwood Burge

Johny Kongerud, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University, Norway Johny Kongerud

V Soyseth, Hydro Aluminium Aardal, Norway V Soyseth

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

Background
Obstructive airways disease in aluminium potroom workers has been recognised for over 50 years. There is still controversy about whether this is true occupational asthma.

Methods
A cross-sectional survey of 379 potroom workers identified 26 subjects with symptoms suggestive of occupational asthma. Of these 26, 14 were considered by the plant physician to have occupational asthma and have a measurable PC20 methacholine. These 14 were further investigated by serial measurements of PEF at home and work, symptom diaries and measurements of methacholine reactivity before and after a three-week holiday.

Results
There was a good correlation between daily symptom scores and minimum PEF measurements; these showed changes characteristic of occupational asthma in 10 workers, with increased diurnal variation in PEF and consistent deterioration in relation to work exposure. One further record showed probable occupational asthma and two showed consistent small changes in PEF related to work exposure more in keeping with an irritant effect. Only one record was inadequate. Methacholine reactivity on a work-day was within the normal range in 13 subjects. A doubling of PC20 methacholine occurred in five of nine subjects with occupational asthma in whom repeated measurements were possible.

Conclusion
This study confirms the existence of aluminium potroom asthma. The lack of correlation with measurements of non-specific responsiveness suggests that the primary mechanism is one of hypersensitivity, perhaps enhanced by the bronchial irritants also present in the potroom.

Full Text

Full text of this reference not available

Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference

Associated Questions

There are no associations for this paper.

Please Log In or Register to put forward this reference as evidence to a question.

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo