Occupational Asthma Reference

Vandenplas O, Cartier A, Lesage J, Cloutier Y, Perreault G, Grammer LC, Shaughnessy MA, Malo JL, Prepolymers of hexamethylene diisocyanate as a cause of occupational asthma, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1993;91:850-861,

Keywords: oa, isocyanate, HDI, paint, isocyanate prepolymer, ch, key, br, IgE, HDI prepolymer, update

Known Authors

André Cartier, Hôpital de Sacré Coeur, Montreal, Quebec, Canada André Cartier

Olivier Vandenplas, Universite Mont-Goginne, Yvoir Olivier Vandenplas

Jean-Luc Malo, Hôpital de Sacré Coeur, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Jean-Luc Malo

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Occupational asthma (OA) caused by products that contain hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) has been ascribed to the highly volatile monomer of HDI. Most two-component paints are now made up primarily of nonvolatile prepolymers of HDI (30% to 60%) with only trace amounts (: 0.1%) of the monomer. The respective role of the two chemical forms of HDI in causing OA has never been investigated.

METHODS
Twenty workers who were consecutively referred for possible OA that resulted from exposure to spray paints underwent inhalation challenges on separate days with pure HDI monomer and the commercial formulation of HDI prepolymers to which they had been exposed at work.

RESULTS
Specific inhalation challenges elicited a positive asthmatic reaction in 10 of the 20 subjects. Among these subjects, four had positive bronchial reactions (two early, one late, and one dual) to both the monomer and the prepolymers. Four other subjects had asthmatic reactions (two early, one late, and one dual) after exposure to the prepolymers but not after exposure to the monomer. The discordance in bronchial response elicited by the monomer and the prepolymers could not be due to differences in the level of baseline nonspecific bronchial reactivity or in HDI concentrations during the tests. One subject showed an atypical progressive reaction after exposure to the monomer but not after exposure to the prepolymer. In this case, the discordant response could be explained by differences in HDI concentration.

CONCLUSION
These observations show that, although they are nonvolatile, the prepolymers of HDI can induce OA and that asthmatic reactions as a result of exposure to prepolymers but not the monomer is not a rare occurrence

Full Text

Full text of this reference not available

Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference

Associated Questions

There are no associations for this paper.

Please Log In or Register to put forward this reference as evidence to a question.

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo